A pair of resolutions on the consent agenda for the Butte County Board of Supervisors’ Tuesday meeting could see the panel come out in favor of a citizen’s proper to keep and bear arms, and in opposition to a proposed Indian casino in Yuba County.

Inside the first case, Oroville Supervisor Bill Connelly, who also chairs the board, has asked his fellow supervisors “to contemplate a resolution affirming the board’s support from the Second Amendment to the Usa Constitution.”

The Second Amendment reads, “A effectively regulated Militia, being important for the safety of a totally free State, the best of your folks to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

The second resolution, also submitted at Connelly’s request, asks the state Legislature and governor to deny a “Class III gaming compact” with the Enterprise Rancheria, which is located inside the foothills east of Oroville, on land the rancheria recently acquired in Yuba County.

The resolution asserts the Yuba County location of a further Indian casino would negatively influence Oroville’s Gold Nation Casino, owned by the Tyme-Maidu Berry Creek Rancheria, and the Feather Falls Casino, owned by the Concow-Maidu Mooretown Rancheria.

As outlined by the National Indian Gaming Commission web-site, “Class III” gaming covers black jack, some other card games, slot machines, and “electronic or electro-mechanical facsimiles of any game of likelihood.”

The resolution calls upon the Legislature along with the governor not to damage or destroy “the economic base of the Butte County Indian community and adversely impacting the economy and also the people today of Butte County” by accommodating the casino to significant urban locations from which the current Indian casinos draw the majority of their patrons.

Both with the existing casinos are inside Connelly’s district.

Because the two things are on the consent agenda, exactly where many non-controversial products can be approved inside a single vote, the resolutions may perhaps not even be brought up for public discussion before the vote.

Also around the consent agenda will be the county’s new noise ordinance, which came just before the board for a public hearing at the supervisors’ Feb. 26 meeting.

The ordinance sets limits on what kind of noises might be generated in rural and urban settings within the county’s jurisdiction. The noise levels are established by certain decibel levels. The measure also particularly exempts activities such as outside festivals and music events covered by county licenses or use permits.

Through the Feb. 26 meeting, the supervisors voted to tentatively approve the new ordinance. During Tuesday’s meeting, the supervisors could finalize that approval.